"Urban Planning and Multiple Preference Schedules: On R.M. Hare's 'Contrasting Methods in Environmental Planning'"
Roger Paden presents a critical analysis of Hare’s article “Contrasting Methods in Environmental Planning.”
Roger Paden presents a critical analysis of Hare’s article “Contrasting Methods in Environmental Planning.”
Klaus Peter Rippe and Peter Schaber discuss democracy and environmental decision-making.
Annie L. Booth discusses environmental spirituality.
Maurie J. Cohen introduces this special issue of Environmental Values.
Sheila Jasanoff reflects on the role of science in promoting convergent perceptions of risk across disparate political cultures.
Maurie J. Cohen undertakes a comparative analysis of how national context has differently shaped science as a public epistemology.
Jost Halfmann illustrates the differences between images of risk by comparing the American and German anti-nuclear movements.
Andrew Jamison and Erik Baark attempt to indicate how national cultural differences affect the ways in which science and technology policies in the environmental field are formulated and implemented.
Barbara Adam explores the temporal dimension of risks associated with the production, trade, and consumption of food.
Bronislaw Szerszynski explores some of the implications of attending to the performative aspects of language for the sociological understanding of issues of risk and trust among lay communities.