Rolston, Holmes, III, "Saving Nature, Feeding People, and the Foundations of Ethics"
Holmes Rolston III discusses nature and development in an invited response to other articles in this issue of Environmental Values.
Holmes Rolston III discusses nature and development in an invited response to other articles in this issue of Environmental Values.
Val Plumwood clarifies her stance on intentionality and the possibility of nonhuman agency, with reference to apparently purposeful machines and to Dennett’s theory of consciousness.
Michael Prior discusses the theory behind economic valuation, concluding that all environmental valuation is at odds with beliefs based upon the existence of objective and intrinsic values.
Response to Dale Jamieson’s article ‘Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic’ in Environmental Values 7, No. 1.
Roger Crisp responds to Dale Jamieson’s views on animal liberation as environmental ethic.
Brian Baxter responds to Onora O’Neill’s argument that environmental ethics could and should be reformulated in terms of a search for the obligations held by moral agents towards each other, with respect to the non-human world.
Jon Wetlesen addresses the question: Who or what can have a moral status in the sense that we have direct moral duties to them?
J. Baird Callicott responds to Ben A. Minteer’s representation of his critique of moral pluralism.
Alan Carter seeks to advance our understanding of some of the possibilities within Humean moral theory, while simultaneously providing new foundations for both animal welfare and a wider environmental ethic.
Nigel Dower discusses human development in relation to environmental ethics.